Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Yearwood's avatar

Alito and his gang are still Justices, appointed by a president and approved by the senate. What they really want is to return the nation to 1789, where women could not vote, a Black human was only 3/5ths as valuable as a white person and enslaved, women had no place outside the home (barefoot and pregnant), and a man was not allowed to beat his wife with a stick whose circumference was larger than his forefinger. This is what “originalism” as a legal theory actually means, and what every one of these Justices want. Puritanical Catholicism is of course at the root of this movement, as you ably observe. // These disgusting people may be able to force females aged 10-70 to bear children, by rape or threat, but they cannot force them to be mothers. // This court and its cruel puritans give us the strongest reason to finally ratify the Equal Rights Amendment. // Love Housman. Love Wilde. Particularly love Shaw, whose comment, “Beware the man whose God is in the clouds,” has been a guiding principle of mine since I was 17. Man and Superman, anyone?

Jean in Florida's avatar

I’ve always loved Housman’s poems. One of my very favorites is “Loveliest of Trees”, although I don’t have fifty springs left, in fact I’m beyond the three score years & ten! No cherry trees here in Florida, but I try to take time to find small pleasures in each day, in spite of all the trouble & strife in the world today. I am going to order Housman’s “Last Poems” to catch up on what I’ve missed. Thank you for that.

I hadn’t read “The Laws of God, the Laws of Man” before, but it certainly applies, especially ironical on this Mothers’ Day.

34 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?